texashuntingforum.com logo
Main Menu
Advertisement
Affiliates
Advertisement
Newest Members
4Notch, Niknoc76, breederbuck33, Breakin25, Jee
72039 Registered Users
Top Posters(All Time)
dogcatcher 110,795
bill oxner 91,416
SnakeWrangler 65,514
stxranchman 60,296
Gravytrain 46,950
RKHarm24 44,585
rifleman 44,461
Stub 43,847
Forum Statistics
Forums46
Topics537,758
Posts9,728,773
Members87,039
Most Online25,604
Feb 12th, 2024
Print Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Rifle recoil 243 x 7mm-08? #5526078 01/07/15 09:47 PM
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 15,959
J
Jimbo1 Offline OP
THF Celebrity
OP Offline
THF Celebrity
J
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 15,959
Wife wants her own deer rifle. She's a little thing so I'm going with a youth model Savage Tropy Hunter 11. She shoots my 30-30 just fine and can handle a 12ga pretty good. I was originally thinking of a 243, but now i'm leaning towards a 7mm-08. How much difference in recoil is the 7mm-08? Thanks


FJB - Lets Go Brandon
BBB - Bring Back Better
Awake - Not Woke!
Re: Rifle recoil 243 x 7mm-08? [Re: Jimbo1] #5526086 01/07/15 09:51 PM
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 27,091
N
Nogalus Prairie Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
N
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 27,091
They are both very mild. She should have no trouble given she shoots the .30-30 and .12 gauge with no issues.

Last edited by Nogalus Prairie; 01/07/15 09:51 PM.

Originally Posted by Russ79
I learned long ago you can't reason someone out of something they don't reason themselves into.


Re: Rifle recoil 243 x 7mm-08? [Re: Jimbo1] #5526089 01/07/15 09:51 PM
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,124
P
postoak Offline
Veteran Tracker
Offline
Veteran Tracker
P
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,124
In between the two is the .260 Remington (also based on the .308 WCF). Just a thought.


Re: Rifle recoil 243 x 7mm-08? [Re: Jimbo1] #5526105 01/07/15 09:57 PM
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 18,934
C
ChadTRG42 Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
C
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 18,934
That rifle weighs 8.25 lbs, and with a 1 lb scope that's a total of 9.25 lbs.

243 Win with 87 grain bullet @ 3200 fps
Velocity= 7.08
ft/lbs= 7.20

7mm-08 with 140 grain @ 2800 fps
Velocity= 8.83
ft/lbs= 11.21

Going up from a 243 to a 7mm-08 in this example is a 55% increase in recoil.

I'm using this website for calculations: http://www.handloads.com/calc/recoil.asp


[Linked Image]
Custom and Precision Ammunition!!
https://DallasReloads.com/
Type 01 and Type 06 FFL
Re: Rifle recoil 243 x 7mm-08? [Re: Jimbo1] #5526106 01/07/15 09:57 PM
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,124
P
postoak Offline
Veteran Tracker
Offline
Veteran Tracker
P
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,124
Just looking at the recoil tables, both the .260 Remington and 7-08 are going to have more recoil than the .30-30, so I'd think twice about moving up to them.


Re: Rifle recoil 243 x 7mm-08? [Re: Jimbo1] #5526118 01/07/15 10:01 PM
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,124
P
postoak Offline
Veteran Tracker
Offline
Veteran Tracker
P
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,124
And my experience is that rifle weight makes a huge difference in felt recoil -- as does a good thick recoil pad. People who give small shooters a light rifle are making a mistake IMO.


Re: Rifle recoil 243 x 7mm-08? [Re: Jimbo1] #5526160 01/07/15 10:23 PM
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 33,946
B
Buzzsaw Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
B
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 33,946
Both are great deer cals. My daughter started with a .243, She moved up to a 7mm-08 this year with no problems and she's a small gal.

Get the Hornady "LITE" factory loads. They have the Hornady SST bullets and kill deer and blackbuck DEAD.

Re: Rifle recoil 243 x 7mm-08? [Re: Jimbo1] #5526162 01/07/15 10:25 PM
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 1,197
C
Chris42 Offline
Pro Tracker
Offline
Pro Tracker
C
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 1,197
there are simply a huge amount of .243's out there. Try and have her shoot some.

A 30-30 will kill deer. A .243 will kill deer. A 7mm-08 will kill deer.

There aren't bad choices, just your wife's preferences.

I would have her shoot a .243, and if she liked it, I'd get one of them. I'm the minority on this forum, and I don't see the real benefit of the 7mm-08 over other common calibers. Nothing wrong with it, its nice to have whatever you want and all that. They pretty much all will kill deer.

I'd worry more about finding a rifle that fit your wife.

Re: Rifle recoil 243 x 7mm-08? [Re: Jimbo1] #5526182 01/07/15 10:34 PM
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 4,294
oldoak2000 Offline
Extreme Tracker
Offline
Extreme Tracker
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 4,294
IF I was you, I'd get the .243 ; fine deer rifle for her, and YOU can run 58 grain rounds in it for varmints & target shooting - fun!

Re: Rifle recoil 243 x 7mm-08? [Re: Jimbo1] #5526257 01/07/15 11:09 PM
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 3,809
C
Cleric Offline
Extreme Tracker
Offline
Extreme Tracker
C
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 3,809
suppressor ftw

Re: Rifle recoil 243 x 7mm-08? [Re: oldoak2000] #5526277 01/07/15 11:18 PM
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 2,016
S
SingleShot85 Offline
Veteran Tracker
Offline
Veteran Tracker
S
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 2,016
Originally Posted By: oldoak2000
IF I was you, I'd get the .243 ; fine deer rifle for her, and YOU can run 58 grain rounds in it for varmints & target shooting - fun!


you can do the same w 100gr 7mm projectiles and have better top end bullets as well

I vote 7-08

Re: Rifle recoil 243 x 7mm-08? [Re: SingleShot85] #5526289 01/07/15 11:22 PM
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,900
J
JJH Offline
Extreme Tracker
Offline
Extreme Tracker
J
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,900
I recommend either the 243 with good deer (read not varmint) bullets, or a 7-08 with reduced recoil loads

Re: Rifle recoil 243 x 7mm-08? [Re: Jimbo1] #5526290 01/07/15 11:22 PM
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,586
C
ckat Offline
Pro Tracker
Offline
Pro Tracker
C
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,586
I have both. My thoughts when reading your original post, was that there is a noticeable difference. My 243s are very mild while the 7mm-08 has a pronounced (but manageable) kick with both 120s and 140s. Chad's data seem to jive with what I feel on the "felt difference."

Last edited by ckat; 01/08/15 01:30 AM. Reason: Spelling
Re: Rifle recoil 243 x 7mm-08? [Re: ckat] #5526426 01/08/15 12:32 AM
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 695
JD4030 Offline
Tracker
Offline
Tracker
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 695
Originally Posted By: ckat
I have both. My thoughts when reading your original post, was that their is a noticeable difference. My 243s are very mild while the 7mm-08 has a pronounced (but manageable) kick with both 120s and 140s. Chad's data seem to jive with what I feel on the "felt difference."


I would be cautious and go .243, it will do the job well and will be more enjoyable for her to shoot; 7MM-08 has plenty of punch, especially for a gal.


Custom hay cutting / baling, combining in Southern Dallas / Ellis county; please visit our website or send me a PM for pricing, etc: http://stewart-farms.net/

Re: Rifle recoil 243 x 7mm-08? [Re: Jimbo1] #5526594 01/08/15 01:39 AM
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 14,199
T
tth_40 Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
T
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 14,199
7mm-08.

If it's too much recoil, look at installing a muzzle brake. I'm prepping to do that with my .30-06.


Originally Posted By: theserxtremedays
Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large numbers
Re: Rifle recoil 243 x 7mm-08? [Re: ChadTRG42] #5526613 01/08/15 01:45 AM
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 27,091
N
Nogalus Prairie Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
N
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 27,091
Originally Posted By: ChadTRG42
That rifle weighs 8.25 lbs, and with a 1 lb scope that's a total of 9.25 lbs.

243 Win with 87 grain bullet @ 3200 fps
Velocity= 7.08
ft/lbs= 7.20

7mm-08 with 140 grain @ 2800 fps
Velocity= 8.83
ft/lbs= 11.21

Going up from a 243 to a 7mm-08 in this example is a 55% increase in recoil.

I'm using this website for calculations: http://www.handloads.com/calc/recoil.asp


True. But it's all kind of relative. Given that the vast majority of 12 year olds have no issues shooting a 7mm-08 (unless their recoil-shy parents have scared the chit out of them), I'm thinking she will be fine whatever she chooses.

Last edited by Nogalus Prairie; 01/08/15 01:47 AM.

Originally Posted by Russ79
I learned long ago you can't reason someone out of something they don't reason themselves into.


Re: Rifle recoil 243 x 7mm-08? [Re: Jimbo1] #5526665 01/08/15 02:01 AM
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,755
E
eneat1119 Offline
Pro Tracker
Offline
Pro Tracker
E
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,755
Put my 8 yr old boy on my XBolt 7mm-08 this year. He loves it. Killed two this year with it. Says to him it has no kick at all.

FWIW my son is very tall and lanky. Not a shred of fat on him just to let ya know his body frame.

Re: Rifle recoil 243 x 7mm-08? [Re: Jimbo1] #5526694 01/08/15 02:11 AM
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,396
P
Pittstate Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
P
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,396
Got my daughter a .308 with factory muzzle brake from Weatherby (Vanguard 2 youth model). It is very similar to her .243 on recoil (without muzzle brake). I like the .308 caliber over the 7MM08 only because ammo is easier to find (same with .260). Out to 100 yards, the .308 has enough power to hunt Elk with great confidence and many would say out to 200 yards. Also, it is easy to find very cheap fmj ammo to practice with.

Re: Rifle recoil 243 x 7mm-08? [Re: Nogalus Prairie] #5526701 01/08/15 02:13 AM
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 60,414
BOBO the Clown Offline
kind of a big deal
Offline
kind of a big deal
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 60,414
Originally Posted By: Nogalus Prairie
Originally Posted By: ChadTRG42
That rifle weighs 8.25 lbs, and with a 1 lb scope that's a total of 9.25 lbs.

243 Win with 87 grain bullet @ 3200 fps
Velocity= 7.08
ft/lbs= 7.20

7mm-08 with 140 grain @ 2800 fps
Velocity= 8.83
ft/lbs= 11.21

Going up from a 243 to a 7mm-08 in this example is a 55% increase in recoil.

I'm using this website for calculations: http://www.handloads.com/calc/recoil.asp


True. But it's all kind of relative. Given that the vast majority of 12 year olds have no issues shooting a 7mm-08 (unless their recoil-shy parents have scared the chit out of them), I'm thinking she will be fine whatever she chooses.


Did you start your college age daughter off with a 30-06? Just saying... I'd care more about where they can put the bullet rather then caliber..but most kids it's the sound more then recoil



Donate to TX Youth hunting program.... better to donate then to waste it in taxes

https://secure.qgiv.com/for/gtgoh/mobile
Re: Rifle recoil 243 x 7mm-08? [Re: Jimbo1] #5526709 01/08/15 02:16 AM
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 60,414
BOBO the Clown Offline
kind of a big deal
Offline
kind of a big deal
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 60,414
If the OP's wife can handle (effectively) a 12ga

7-08, 260 or 6.5 creedmoor is a great choice, but nothing wrong with 243 either.


My wife uses creedmoor, 25-06, 257wby but she is also 5'10


Donate to TX Youth hunting program.... better to donate then to waste it in taxes

https://secure.qgiv.com/for/gtgoh/mobile
Re: Rifle recoil 243 x 7mm-08? [Re: Jimbo1] #5526719 01/08/15 02:20 AM
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 216
B
bcranch Offline
Woodsman
Offline
Woodsman
B
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 216
Rifle fit will make a huge difference in felt recoil for her rifle, if she can handle a 12 ga a 7-08 that fits her well should make a great deer rifle for her.



Brave Rifles!
Re: Rifle recoil 243 x 7mm-08? [Re: Jimbo1] #5526722 01/08/15 02:20 AM
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,856
3
30378 Offline
Veteran Tracker
Offline
Veteran Tracker
3
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,856
Not a thing wrong with a good accurate 243!


NRA Benefactor Life Member - Free men should not be subjected to permits, paperwork and taxation in order to carry a firearm.
Re: Rifle recoil 243 x 7mm-08? [Re: Jimbo1] #5526724 01/08/15 02:21 AM
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 60,414
BOBO the Clown Offline
kind of a big deal
Offline
kind of a big deal
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 60,414
Also women tend to have longer trigger pulls then one would think. They tend to be longer necked


Donate to TX Youth hunting program.... better to donate then to waste it in taxes

https://secure.qgiv.com/for/gtgoh/mobile
Re: Rifle recoil 243 x 7mm-08? [Re: ChadTRG42] #5526729 01/08/15 02:23 AM
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,124
P
postoak Offline
Veteran Tracker
Offline
Veteran Tracker
P
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,124
Originally Posted By: ChadTRG42
That rifle weighs 8.25 lbs, and with a 1 lb scope that's a total of 9.25 lbs.

243 Win with 87 grain bullet @ 3200 fps
Velocity= 7.08
ft/lbs= 7.20

7mm-08 with 140 grain @ 2800 fps
Velocity= 8.83
ft/lbs= 11.21

Going up from a 243 to a 7mm-08 in this example is a 55% increase in recoil.

I'm using this website for calculations: http://www.handloads.com/calc/recoil.asp


That weight didn't sound right so I went over to the Savage site and it says 7.25 pounds for the .243 and 7 pounds for the same rifle in 7mm-08. But that just makes things worse.


Re: Rifle recoil 243 x 7mm-08? [Re: Jimbo1] #5526737 01/08/15 02:27 AM
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 27,091
N
Nogalus Prairie Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
N
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 27,091
The .243 is fine.

But arguing the punishing recoil of the 7mm-08, talking about muzzle brakes, etc. just makes me chuckle.


Originally Posted by Russ79
I learned long ago you can't reason someone out of something they don't reason themselves into.


Page 1 of 2 1 2
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

© 2004-2024 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3