Main Menu
Advertisement
Affiliates
Advertisement
Newest Members
orlandowiebe, Z-man65, LWH, BigHit, Sifat
60476 Registered Users
Top Posters
dogcatcher 77510
stxranchman 52092
RWH24 44568
rifleman 43788
BOBO the Clown 41122
BMD 40539
Big Orn 37484
txshntr 33685
bill oxner 32681
sig226fan (Rguns.com) 30571
facebook
Forum Stats
60476 Members
45 Forums
476184 Topics
6246652 Posts

Max Online: 16728 @ 03/25/12 08:51 AM
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >
Topic Options
#5520671 - 01/04/15 11:25 PM .300BO vs. 7.62x39
Dragonuv Offline


Registered: 01/31/09
Posts: 3897
Loc: Abilene, TX USA
Which would be a better hog round, and why? Lots of things I read say that there really isn't a lot of difference, but I wanted to hear from the folks that have used both and actually know. Thanks in advance.
_________________________

Top
#5520847 - 01/05/15 07:20 AM Re: .300BO vs. 7.62x39 [Re: Dragonuv]
Precision_Shooter Online   content


Registered: 02/18/09
Posts: 827
Loc: Crossroads, TX
7.62x39 will push the same weight bullet 300-400fps faster than 300AAC.
But, there are more types and weights of bullets available for 300aac since it uses .308 bullets. Hard to find much of anything for hunting outside of the 123-125gr bullets for 7.62x39.
_________________________
"Laws that forbid the carrying of arms disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes. Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants." - Thomas Jefferson, 1776

Top
#5520869 - 01/05/15 07:40 AM Re: .300BO vs. 7.62x39 [Re: Dragonuv]
505ed Online   content
Bird Dog

Registered: 10/15/14
Posts: 364
Loc: Blanco texas
I am a blackout fan, anything from 110 grain to 220 OTC,runs in a AR, easy to find brass, does about 85% of everything a 7.62x39 will do...

Ed

Top
#5521003 - 01/05/15 09:03 AM Re: .300BO vs. 7.62x39 [Re: Dragonuv]
bside Offline
Bird Dog

Registered: 06/10/14
Posts: 314
Loc: DFW
Yeah, I agree with both of the above and would summarize it like this -- what the x39 does it does a bit better than the BO, but it doesn't do nearly as many things.

If we're talking about an AR upper, I think the x39 magazines are an utter abortion, while the BO uses standard .223 mags at full capacity.

Top
#5521016 - 01/05/15 09:11 AM Re: .300BO vs. 7.62x39 [Re: Precision_Shooter]
Tff caribou Online   content
Veteran Tracker

Registered: 08/27/12
Posts: 2997
Loc: Watauga, TX
Originally Posted By: Precision_Shooter
7.62x39 will push the same weight bullet 300-400fps faster than 300AAC.
But, there are more types and weights of bullets available for 300aac since it uses .308 bullets. Hard to find much of anything for hunting outside of the 123-125gr bullets for 7.62x39.



True, but you really don't need anything besides a 125gr soft point for hogs and deer anyways. For that matter, a fmj to the brain of a pig is pretty deadly too.
_________________________
The very atmosphere of firearms anywhere and everywhere restrains evil interference. -George Washington

Top
#5521206 - 01/05/15 10:55 AM Re: .300BO vs. 7.62x39 [Re: Tff caribou]
Precision_Shooter Online   content


Registered: 02/18/09
Posts: 827
Loc: Crossroads, TX
Originally Posted By: Tff caribou
Originally Posted By: Precision_Shooter
7.62x39 will push the same weight bullet 300-400fps faster than 300AAC.
But, there are more types and weights of bullets available for 300aac since it uses .308 bullets. Hard to find much of anything for hunting outside of the 123-125gr bullets for 7.62x39.



True, but you really don't need anything besides a 125gr soft point for hogs and deer anyways. For that matter, a fmj to the brain of a pig is pretty deadly too.


Oh I completely agree... I chose a CZ 527 in 7.62x39 for my woods gun. Was just giving him both sides of the coin.
As a hand loader, I Really wish more companies would make varying weights of bullets in .310...
_________________________
"Laws that forbid the carrying of arms disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes. Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants." - Thomas Jefferson, 1776

Top
#5521367 - 01/05/15 12:07 PM Re: .300BO vs. 7.62x39 [Re: Precision_Shooter]
Wader Offline
Tracker

Registered: 12/02/09
Posts: 688
Loc: Krum, TX
Originally Posted By: Precision_Shooter

As a hand loader, I Really wish more companies would make varying weights of bullets in .310...


Amen! Though I really like the .311 150 & 180gr Sierra ProHunters in both my SKS & 91/30, but they have been hard to come by lately.

For factory loads in my Yugo SKS, 154gr soft points have been a hog hunting staple for both head and body shots, and performance has been quite good with both. Also the accuracy is dramatically improved over 12x bullets. May not be an issue in an AR or bolt gun.

-ww
_________________________
Originally Posted By: Robert A. Heinlein
A thousand reasoned opinions never equal to one case of diving in and finding out.

Top
#5521385 - 01/05/15 12:12 PM Re: .300BO vs. 7.62x39 [Re: Dragonuv]
oldoak2000 Offline
Veteran Tracker

Registered: 09/16/07
Posts: 2047
Loc: Denton, TX
Tula ammo makes a 154gr soft-point for 7.62x39.
I think I had some 160gr Cabelas Herters brand ammo in the past as well.

Top
#5521408 - 01/05/15 12:26 PM Re: .300BO vs. 7.62x39 [Re: Dragonuv]
Tactical Cowboy Online   content
Veteran Tracker

Registered: 08/23/11
Posts: 2846
Loc: Abilene
.308
_________________________
The secret to a long life is to try not to shorten it

Top
#5521468 - 01/05/15 12:57 PM Re: .300BO vs. 7.62x39 [Re: Tactical Cowboy]
KRoyal Online   sleepy
THF Celebrity

Registered: 01/24/07
Posts: 13636
Loc: Sherman/North of Dallas
Originally Posted By: Tactical Cowboy
.308


Yuupppppp!!!!
_________________________

Rapid Design Lab

Top
#5521632 - 01/05/15 02:18 PM Re: .300BO vs. 7.62x39 [Re: KRoyal]
Precision_Shooter Online   content


Registered: 02/18/09
Posts: 827
Loc: Crossroads, TX
Originally Posted By: KRoyal
Originally Posted By: Tactical Cowboy
.308


Yuupppppp!!!!


Have 2 of those as well...
_________________________
"Laws that forbid the carrying of arms disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes. Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants." - Thomas Jefferson, 1776

Top
#5521640 - 01/05/15 02:22 PM Re: .300BO vs. 7.62x39 [Re: Dragonuv]
Toxarch Online   content
Pro Tracker

Registered: 03/09/11
Posts: 1680
Loc: Parker County
Like mentioned before, either is fine for pigs. Cheaper ammo in the Russian caliber. More bullet options in the 300blk, including subs if shooting suppressed.
_________________________
It is far more important to be able to hit the target than it is to haggle over who makes a weapon or who pulls a trigger.

— Dwight D. Eisenhower

Top
#5522769 - 01/05/15 11:30 PM Re: .300BO vs. 7.62x39 [Re: Dragonuv]
tenyearsgone Offline
Pro Tracker

Registered: 04/21/13
Posts: 1213
300 blk if I have to choose, but unless you're using a suppressor, it's a pointless round to use.

Top
#5523564 - 01/06/15 12:12 PM Re: .300BO vs. 7.62x39 [Re: tenyearsgone]
angler management Offline
Bird Dog

Registered: 11/18/12
Posts: 375
Loc: in a van, down by the river
Originally Posted By: tenyearsgone
300 blk if I have to choose, but unless you're using a suppressor, it's a pointless round to use.


Why? I only ask because my next upper is either the 300BO or the X39, and I'm leaning X39 because of ammo availability.

Top
#5523656 - 01/06/15 01:04 PM Re: .300BO vs. 7.62x39 [Re: angler management]
bside Offline
Bird Dog

Registered: 06/10/14
Posts: 314
Loc: DFW
Do you reload? Any plans to use it for something like deer hunting or long range work?

Top
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >



© 2004-2016 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide