Here is my opinion, the GW s that I have come in contact with are happy to be involved in deer hunting. I know some people have had bad experiences from what I hear, but I have not. They never mind being called to look at a big deer for sure! Yes I do believe it legitimizes a kill, if the GW is called to the location immediately after the kill. Himself, as well as everyone else knows things were on the up and up. Later if the book is a factor or even Tx big game awards, there are questions asked even a polygraph sometimes. No there were no legal bindings to have to call the GW , but what can it hurt? I personally love having a great relationship with the GW.

1. I still don't understand how that stops people who want to start rumors.
2. I thought GW's were paid to enforce laws, not "deer hunt".
3. I personally think it sucks if a GW responds to a "hey I killed a legal deer and I want your verification/approval", when they are by their own admission cash strapped and unable to respond to legitimate enforcement calls.

Has nothing whatsoever to do with GW relations or history, everything to do with what their duties/responsibilities are. And the fact that it won't stop any jealous busybody from saying whatever they want.

All the game wardens I know would want to see that sucker, legal or not!!!

I don't get the fear, distrust, or hate of game wardens. I am not a pro big government guy but geez, paranoid much?

Still a dang great buck.

Responding to the op is in fact on topic.

And OP, I would have handled it this way when dealing with jealous rumor mongers: "So, you got a problem believing I didn't poach this monster? Call the GW then."