|
Forums46
Topics537,816
Posts9,729,477
Members87,042
| |
Most Online25,604
Feb 12th, 2024
|
|
|
 Re: .243
[Re: lonestar1995]
#5423686
11/16/14 02:40 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 374
Jtmeeks
Bird Dog
|
|
Bird Dog
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 374 |
A .243 will kill anything you want in america. Once again, it's shot placement that matters. You could kill what ever you want with a .22 ( not saying you should!) but it is a very nice caliber.
I don't always exaggerate, I just remember BIG!
|
|
|
|
Re: .243
[Re: ScottA]
#5423713
11/16/14 03:06 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 15,639
QuitShootinYoungBucks
THF Celebrity
|
|
THF Celebrity
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 15,639 |
If you like track jobs then a 243 is great Many people love the .243, but I have talked to numerous hunters who have horror stories of well-shot deer who have covered a few hundred yards before expiring. A .260 or 7-08 doesn't recoil a whole lot more than a .243 so, unless one is especially recoil sensitive, I've never seen the advantage of a .243. I'm willing to bet none of those guys ever made a bad shot in their life, either. I've been around hunting 35 years and I have NEVER seen a well-shot deer travel more than a 100-150 yards. Any deer we recovered that went further than that almost always required a coup de grace, and upon examination the original shot placement was never what one would term 'well-shot'. If you put a lead pill in both lungs, the heart, the liver, or the spine, you'll have a dead deer nearby, be it a 100gr .243 or a 300gr .375, and everything in between.
![[Linked Image]](http://www.katiecortese.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/texas-tech-logo-2-150x150.jpg) https://web.archive.org/web/20170223065011/http:/www.rrdvegas.com/silencer-cleaning.html
|
|
|
 Re: .243
[Re: RUM Mann]
#5423807
11/16/14 04:06 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 4,436
TFF Caribou
Extreme Tracker
|
|
Extreme Tracker
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 4,436 |
A 410 will kill ducks just as dead as a 12 gauge so why don't we all put down the hard kicking 12 gauges? The answer for me is why limit myself? Same could be said for a 243 and let's say a 270. Not the same discussion. The 12 being more effective has less to do with power and more to do with number of bbs. These discussions always go the same way. A 300win mag is more powerful than a .270, but then a .50 is a bigger bullet than a 300wm. I hear people always say, it's enough fun if you have a clean shot. Well if you don't have a clean shot, you shouldn't be taking it. If all you have is a shot at a deers gut or back leg, it doesn't matter what you shoot, it's not going to be a clean kill.
The very atmosphere of firearms anywhere and everywhere restrains evil interference. -George Washington
|
|
|
|
Re: .243
[Re: lonestar1995]
#5423826
11/16/14 04:16 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,034
TxYoteHunter
Veteran Tracker
|
|
Veteran Tracker
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,034 |
A female friend texted me the other day. Said over the weekend she shot a big buck at 125 yards with her .308 and it ran. They tracked it for a while but never recovered it. So, she decided that she is getting rid of the .308 and getting a 7mm magnum so that it doesn't happen again  Now if a .308 at 125 yards is no good what is? Shot placement is her issue but it's easier to blame the gun. It can't tell you that your aim sucks. Hit the good spot with a good rifle and you'll have meat in the freezer. 
|
|
|
|
Re: .243
[Re: TxYoteHunter]
#5423852
11/16/14 04:39 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,170
Jimbo
THF Trophy Hunter
|
|
THF Trophy Hunter
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,170 |
A female friend texted me the other day. Said over the weekend she shot a big buck at 125 yards with her .308 and it ran. They tracked it for a while but never recovered it. So, she decided that she is getting rid of the .308 and getting a 7mm magnum so that it doesn't happen again Now if a .308 at 125 yards is no good what is? Shot placement is her issue but it's easier to blame the gun. It can't tell you that your aim sucks. Hit the good spot with a good rifle and you'll have meat in the freezer. Yep, the .243 has been around for a long, long time, and will continue to be around and taking down deer years from now!
Thursday at 12:45 PM
#33
Once i learned that i didn't "NEED" to kill something, and that if i did kill something all the fun stopped and work began, i was a much better hunter.
|
|
|
|
Re: .243
[Re: lonestar1995]
#5424006
11/16/14 06:34 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,501
Team By-God
Pro Tracker
|
|
Pro Tracker
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,501 |
Minumum .300 rem ulra mag for dangerous game such as whitetail.
|
|
|
|
Re: .243
[Re: Team By-God]
#5424042
11/16/14 07:02 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 4,002
68A
Extreme Tracker
|
|
Extreme Tracker
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 4,002 |
Minumum .300 rem ulra mag for dangerous game such as whitetail. Why limit yourself? The ballistics of a .338 are much better. At this rate we'll be having a discussion in a couple weeks about why the .270 is not adequate.
|
|
|
|
Re: .243
[Re: lonestar1995]
#5424090
11/16/14 07:24 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 374
Jtmeeks
Bird Dog
|
|
Bird Dog
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 374 |
Why don't we all just shoot me with a .50 bmg? Why limit yourself?.. 
I don't always exaggerate, I just remember BIG!
|
|
|
|
Re: .243
[Re: lonestar1995]
#5424166
11/16/14 08:02 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 400
KingwoodCat
Bird Dog
|
|
Bird Dog
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 400 |
[s][/s] Anyone had any bad experiences with a .243 before?. I've had success with it but I'm worried that one day I'll regret using the smaller caliber. My daughter in law has killed 2 in the last 2 years with a little Browning A bolt in .243. It's all about shot placement.
The Federal Government cannot give anything to anyone, that it has not first taken from someone else.
|
|
|
|
Re: .243
[Re: Jtmeeks]
#5424223
11/16/14 08:31 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 15,639
QuitShootinYoungBucks
THF Celebrity
|
|
THF Celebrity
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 15,639 |
Why don't we all just shoot me with a .50 bmg? Why limit yourself?.. i appreciate your offer, TS, but I think even with this thread and your sworn affidavit they'll still prosecute us...
https://web.archive.org/web/20170223065011/http:/www.rrdvegas.com/silencer-cleaning.html
|
|
|
|
Re: .243
[Re: Novemberyet]
#5426526
11/17/14 08:10 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 28
Fheiden
Light Foot
|
|
Light Foot
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 28 |
My grandson shoots a 243 with 100 grain bullet, he was using 70 grain and they were not getting the job done.
|
|
|
|
Re: .243
[Re: Fheiden]
#5426561
11/17/14 08:24 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 15,639
QuitShootinYoungBucks
THF Celebrity
|
|
THF Celebrity
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 15,639 |
My grandson shoots a 243 with 100 grain bullet, he was using 70 grain and they were not getting the job done. 70gr is a varmint bullet, like the 110gr in the 270. It is not intended to shoot deer with.
https://web.archive.org/web/20170223065011/http:/www.rrdvegas.com/silencer-cleaning.html
|
|
|
|
Re: .243
[Re: lonestar1995]
#5426690
11/17/14 09:14 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 303
Conchoman76
Bird Dog
|
|
Bird Dog
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 303 |
I have a .280 Remington Model 700 Mountain rifle that is light and it has a Muzzle break on it. The recoil is the same or less than a .243. Just sayin. And let me Crarify this statement since everything seems to be conceived as rude on these forums. I am in no way trying to be negative at all. To each their own. I do agree with the other poster, Why limit yourself. The extra power is very helpful if the shot is less than perfect. You cant make a perfect shot every time, Especially when the biggest buck you have ever seen comes in and your shaking uncontrollably. Just my 
|
|
|
|
Re: .243
[Re: RUM Mann]
#5426716
11/17/14 09:23 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 39,536
redchevy
THF Celebrity
|
|
THF Celebrity
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 39,536 |
A 410 will kill ducks just as dead as a 12 gauge so why don't we all put down the hard kicking 12 gauges? The answer for me is why limit myself? Same could be said for a 243 and let's say a 270. Now ive heard it all... a 270 isn't big enough 
It's hell eatin em live
|
|
|
|
Re: .243
[Re: Conchoman76]
#5426721
11/17/14 09:25 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 39,536
redchevy
THF Celebrity
|
|
THF Celebrity
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 39,536 |
I have a .280 Remington Model 700 Mountain rifle that is light and it has a Muzzle break on it. The recoil is the same or less than a .243. Just sayin. And let me Crarify this statement since everything seems to be conceived as rude on these forums. I am in no way trying to be negative at all. To each their own. I do agree with the other poster, Why limit yourself. The extra power is very helpful if the shot is less than perfect. You cant make a perfect shot every time, Especially when the biggest buck you have ever seen comes in and your shaking uncontrollably. Just my Same can be said for a 300, put a break on it an can have similar recoil... why limit yourself to a 280? I personally would rather shoot a 243 with no break than a 280 with a break for WT deer hunting. No I don't wear ear plugs while deer hunting. With a 243 it doesn't even phase me with a 280 and a break I might be deaf in two years.
It's hell eatin em live
|
|
|
|
Re: .243
[Re: redchevy]
#5426872
11/17/14 10:07 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 303
Conchoman76
Bird Dog
|
|
Bird Dog
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 303 |
I have a .280 Remington Model 700 Mountain rifle that is light and it has a Muzzle break on it. The recoil is the same or less than a .243. Just sayin. And let me Crarify this statement since everything seems to be conceived as rude on these forums. I am in no way trying to be negative at all. To each their own. I do agree with the other poster, Why limit yourself. The extra power is very helpful if the shot is less than perfect. You cant make a perfect shot every time, Especially when the biggest buck you have ever seen comes in and your shaking uncontrollably. Just my Same can be said for a 300, put a break on it an can have similar recoil... why limit yourself to a 280? I personally would rather shoot a 243 with no break than a 280 with a break for WT deer hunting. No I don't wear ear plugs while deer hunting. With a 243 it doesn't even phase me with a 280 and a break I might be deaf in two years. You have a point lol it is loud as heck!!
|
|
|
|
Re: .243
[Re: QuitShootinYoungBucks]
#5434048
11/20/14 10:44 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 374
Jtmeeks
Bird Dog
|
|
Bird Dog
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 374 |
Why don't we all just shoot me with a .50 bmg? Why limit yourself?.. i appreciate your offer, TS, but I think even with this thread and your sworn affidavit they'll still prosecute us... I ment shoot EM' not me!... 
I don't always exaggerate, I just remember BIG!
|
|
|
|
Re: .243
[Re: ScottA]
#5434077
11/20/14 10:59 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 28,032
Navasot
Hollywood
|
|
Hollywood
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 28,032 |
If you like track jobs then a 243 is great Many people love the .243, but I have talked to numerous hunters who have horror stories of well-shot deer who have covered a few hundred yards before expiring. A .260 or 7-08 doesn't recoil a whole lot more than a .243 so, unless one is especially recoil sensitive, I've never seen the advantage of a .243. I watched a WT doe take a 180gr 30-06 strait to the heart and covered and easy couple hundred before she died... not the only mishap to... chit happens usually the shooters fault rather than the gun... Iv watched even .222 drop deer in their tracks.
|
|
|
|
Re: .243
[Re: lonestar1995]
#5434191
11/21/14 12:07 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 303
Conchoman76
Bird Dog
|
|
Bird Dog
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 303 |
This is the only way to gaurentee the kill! Ha!!
|
|
|
|
Re: .243
[Re: lonestar1995]
#5434310
11/21/14 01:20 AM
|
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 21,271
SniperRAB
THF Celebrity
|
|
THF Celebrity
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 21,271 |
Yea that exit is just not adequate enough 
|
|
|
|
Re: .243
[Re: TxYoteHunter]
#5435042
11/21/14 02:52 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 126
ipscshooter
Woodsman
|
|
Woodsman
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 126 |
A female friend texted me the other day. Said over the weekend she shot a big buck at 125 yards with her .308 and it ran. They tracked it for a while but never recovered it. So, she decided that she is getting rid of the .308 and getting a 7mm magnum so that it doesn't happen again She would probably be better off going the other direction. I bet she flinches with the .308, and that's what caused a poor shot. It'll only get worse with a 7 Mag.
|
|
|
|
Re: .243
[Re: lonestar1995]
#5435069
11/21/14 03:05 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,170
Jimbo
THF Trophy Hunter
|
|
THF Trophy Hunter
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,170 |
Without sufficient range time it makes no difference what you are shooting!
Might as well throw rocks!
Thursday at 12:45 PM
#33
Once i learned that i didn't "NEED" to kill something, and that if i did kill something all the fun stopped and work began, i was a much better hunter.
|
|
|
Moderated by bigbob_ftw, CCBIRDDOGMAN, Chickenman, Derek, DeRico, Duck_Hunter, hetman, jeh7mmmag, JustWingem, kmon11, kry226, kwrhuntinglab, Payne, pertnear, rifleman, sig226fan (Rguns.com), Superduty, TreeBass, txcornhusker
|
![[Linked Image]](http://i.imgur.com/3nCg32d.gif)
