Main Menu
Advertisement
Affiliates
Advertisement
Newest Members
Gringo, mkydsm, JTinSa, New Zealand Safaris, Shadow Slayer
59254 Registered Users
Top Posters
dogcatcher 73180
stxranchman 51028
RWH24 44568
rifleman 43400
BOBO the Clown 40660
BMD 40464
Big Orn 37484
txshntr 32917
sig226fan (Rguns.com) 30029
bill oxner 29663
facebook
Forum Stats
59254 Members
45 Forums
461216 Topics
6049970 Posts

Max Online: 16728 @ 03/25/12 08:51 AM
Topic Options
#3798851 - 11/29/12 07:36 AM binocular comparisons
.45colt Offline
Green Horn

Registered: 11/13/12
Posts: 8
I need to purchase a new set of binoculars and have about 300 dollars to spend. I have narrowed it down to Vortex diamondbacks 10x42, Leupold cascades 10x42 and Nikon monark 5 10x42. Am I comparing apples to apples in quality? Thanks in advance.

Top
#3803332 - 11/30/12 01:46 PM Re: binocular comparisons [Re: .45colt]
Skylar@SWFA Offline
Veteran Tracker

Registered: 04/16/11
Posts: 2694
Loc: SWFA Outdoors
Apples to apples comparision, you will not find differences in light performance, because the mechanical aspect is identical.

I really like the close focus with the Diamondbacks though. But that is a personal preference for me.

Top
#3805432 - 12/01/12 08:30 AM Re: binocular comparisons [Re: Skylar@SWFA]
twinbubba Offline
Veteran Tracker

Registered: 08/20/09
Posts: 2389
Loc: DFW
When I was looking last year I also looked at the Vortex diamondbacks 10x42 and the Leupold cascades 10x42. I could see no differenct in the optics but went with the Leupold because they seemed a little lighter and less bulky than the Vortex.
_________________________
09 Yamaha Rhino 450 Camo, Weekend Warrior FS2300 toy hauler
"I didn't climb to the top of the food chain to eat only vegetables!"

Top
#3810138 - 12/03/12 07:19 AM Re: binocular comparisons [Re: .45colt]
.45colt Offline
Green Horn

Registered: 11/13/12
Posts: 8
Thanks to the guys at SWFA for helping me with my selection, I ended up with the Nikon monarch 5 10x42. Mainly because they fit my hands the best, but all 3 are really great glass for the price.

Top
#3849639 - 12/14/12 09:56 PM Re: binocular comparisons [Re: .45colt]
wacorusty Offline
THF Trophy Hunter

Registered: 06/09/10
Posts: 7827
Loc: Six Shooter Junction
I just had a long conversation at BPS this morning. I couldn't tell a difference between Monarch or Cascades. I tried some $1000 Conquests and was able to recognize the difference in light, but was not impressed enough to spend another $700 for them. I'm leaning towards the Cascades because I have had good service on a Leo scope.
_________________________
"The arrogance of officialdom should be tempered and controlled, and assistance to foreign hands should be curtailed, lest Rome fall." Cicero

Top
#3849820 - 12/14/12 11:27 PM Re: binocular comparisons [Re: wacorusty]
caddokiller Offline
THF Trophy Hunter

Registered: 09/25/06
Posts: 5403
Loc: midlothian texas
I would personally spend a extra $50 and buy the steiner predator extremes that cameralandny has demos of.
_________________________
The beauty of the Second Amendment is that it will not be needed until they try to take it.- Thomas jefferson

Top
#3850513 - 12/15/12 10:14 AM Re: binocular comparisons [Re: caddokiller]
wacorusty Offline
THF Trophy Hunter

Registered: 06/09/10
Posts: 7827
Loc: Six Shooter Junction
I keep going back to the Cabelas Euro HD (aka Meoptas) I'm just having a hard time with $1000 price tag.
_________________________
"The arrogance of officialdom should be tempered and controlled, and assistance to foreign hands should be curtailed, lest Rome fall." Cicero

Top
#3850536 - 12/15/12 10:21 AM Re: binocular comparisons [Re: wacorusty]
kmon1 Offline
junior

Registered: 09/27/06
Posts: 19523
Loc: Texas
Originally Posted By: wacorusty
I keep going back to the Cabelas Euro HD (aka Meoptas) I'm just having a hard time with $1000 price tag.


I like those but compare them with the Vortex Viper HD and there is not the $ difference enough to get me to swing for the Euro's over the Vipers.
_________________________
Guidelines / Rules of Conduct
http://www.texashuntingforum.com/rules.htm

RULES for using the TRADING POST
http://www.texashuntingforum.com/forum/u..._PO#Post1959111

Top
#3850548 - 12/15/12 10:24 AM Re: binocular comparisons [Re: .45colt]
stxranchman Online   content
Obie Juan Kenobi

Registered: 08/04/10
Posts: 51028
Originally Posted By: .45colt
Thanks to the guys at SWFA for helping me with my selection, I ended up with the Nikon monarch 5 10x42. Mainly because they fit my hands the best, but all 3 are really great glass for the price.

I owned a pair of Nikon 10x42 I used for everyday use not during deer season and as a loaner pair. At first they were great and clear. But after 3 yrs the lenses scratched quickly and they were not very clear anymore. I sent them back and they did replace them with new ones. Which I then gave away. Good luck.
_________________________
http://www.cwdmyths.com/

Top
#3850632 - 12/15/12 11:01 AM Re: binocular comparisons [Re: kmon1]
wacorusty Offline
THF Trophy Hunter

Registered: 06/09/10
Posts: 7827
Loc: Six Shooter Junction
Originally Posted By: kmon1
Originally Posted By: wacorusty
I keep going back to the Cabelas Euro HD (aka Meoptas) I'm just having a hard time with $1000 price tag.


I like those but compare them with the Vortex Viper HD and there is not the $ difference enough to get me to swing for the Euro's over the Vipers.

I didn't pick up the Vortex. How long have you had them and do you think they will last as long as the Nikons or Leo's?
_________________________
"The arrogance of officialdom should be tempered and controlled, and assistance to foreign hands should be curtailed, lest Rome fall." Cicero

Top
#3851016 - 12/15/12 02:22 PM Re: binocular comparisons [Re: wacorusty]
603Country Online   content
Extreme Tracker

Registered: 07/03/12
Posts: 4485
Loc: Central Texas
We've got 2 pair of the Nikon Monarch 10x42 and one pair of the 10x50's. All are very clear, though the 10x42's are a good bit smaller and easier to handle and carry around. For my hunting, I use some rather old Leica 10x40 and I'll never give them up. But for what you want to spend, any of what you mentioned should be just fine. It just comes down to personal preference and what feels best in your hand. As for the quality of the glass, the differences are probably very minor. If there's anything that I can say about the Nikons that is slightly negative, it's that their toughness is questionable. Which of the binocs will best survive a 4 foot drop on a hard surface? I'd factor that into the purchase, if you can.

Top



© 2004-2016 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide