texashuntingforum.com logo
Main Menu
Advertisement
Affiliates
Advertisement
Newest Members
yeky83, Virgil Martin, Lease manager, AJH, jandj
73156 Registered Users
Top Posters(All Time)
dogcatcher 110,840
bill oxner 91,416
SnakeWrangler 68,183
stxranchman 60,296
Gravytrain 46,950
Stub 46,414
RKHarm24 44,585
rifleman 44,461
Forum Statistics
Forums46
Topics551,876
Posts9,897,654
Members88,156
Most Online28,231
Feb 7th, 2025
Print Thread
No funding, no trespassing #2796467 11/30/11 01:44 PM
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 14,768
jeh7mmmag Offline OP
gramps
OP Offline
gramps
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 14,768

No funding, no trespassing

By Steve Kline, Director, Center for Agricultural Lands at the Theodore Roosevelt Conservation Partnership - 11/29/11 09:07 AM ET



Before breaking for Thanksgiving, Congress voted to de-fund the Voluntary Public Access and Habitat Incentive Program (VPA-HIP) as part of the FY2012 agriculture appropriations bill. It is ironic that funding for a program that encourages landowners to make their property accessible to hunters and anglers would be eliminated just as millions of hunters nationwide prepared to hit the woods over the holiday weekend. And whether or not they hunt themselves, all Americans benefit from sportsmen’s dollars and the conservation investments provided by license sales and excise taxes, and therefore, the elimination of VPA-HIP deserves some attention.
http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/energy-a-environment/195833-no-funding-no-trespassing



�Everybody needs beauty as well as bread, places to play in and pray in,
where nature may heal and give strength to body and soul.�
~ John Muir
Re: No funding, no trespassing [Re: jeh7mmmag] #2796500 11/30/11 01:54 PM
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 21,546
TurkeyHunter Offline
determined
Offline
determined
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 21,546
I bet that was not widely adopted in Texas.


Re: No funding, no trespassing [Re: TurkeyHunter] #2796543 11/30/11 02:09 PM
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 14,768
jeh7mmmag Offline OP
gramps
OP Offline
gramps
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 14,768
I don't know if we get any funding from it or not. Still looks like a loss to sportsman again. Sacrifices for the little man coming.



�Everybody needs beauty as well as bread, places to play in and pray in,
where nature may heal and give strength to body and soul.�
~ John Muir
Re: No funding, no trespassing [Re: jeh7mmmag] #2797737 11/30/11 07:45 PM
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,550
K
kyotee1 Offline
Extreme Tracker
Offline
Extreme Tracker
K
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,550
Yes, it did hit Texas - we had grant money secured for 3 years to reach out to landowners for more public hunting lands and stinking Congress cut 2 years of the grant funding.

Dadgun jerks and know little to nothing about what sportsmen & women along with many non-consumptive users pay to enjoy those public lands.


Re: No funding, no trespassing [Re: kyotee1] #2797930 11/30/11 08:50 PM
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 500
B
Bill Waldschmidt Offline
Tracker
Offline
Tracker
B
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 500
Y'all realize that this was not an attack at outdoorsmen, right? Everyone is getting hit with budget cuts.

How can they cut defense, education, and public service spending without cutting recreation spending as well?


Re: No funding, no trespassing [Re: Bill Waldschmidt] #2798022 11/30/11 09:27 PM
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 585
D
Dadsaid Offline
Tracker
Offline
Tracker
D
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 585
yep, the gov is making a number of cut backs.


Re: No funding, no trespassing [Re: Dadsaid] #2798720 12/01/11 01:13 AM
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 80
F
FiftySix Offline
Outdoorsman
Offline
Outdoorsman
F
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 80
Let me get this straight...

Taxes - we all pay - are used to convince landowners to voluntarily allow hunting on their land. And someone thought this was a good idea???

No wonder our debt is quickly approaching 16 trillion...


Re: No funding, no trespassing [Re: FiftySix] #2799217 12/01/11 03:24 AM
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,480
M
mossberg man Offline
Pro Tracker
Offline
Pro Tracker
M
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,480
funny how you dont here about them cutting any 'entitlement' monies.



she said ,why does that ammo have pretty green tips on it? the guy said its the eco-friendy ammo.
Re: No funding, no trespassing [Re: FiftySix] #2799983 12/01/11 01:53 PM
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,550
K
kyotee1 Offline
Extreme Tracker
Offline
Extreme Tracker
K
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,550
Originally Posted By: FiftySix
Let me get this straight...

Taxes - we all pay - are used to convince landowners to voluntarily allow hunting on their land. And someone thought this was a good idea???

No wonder our debt is quickly approaching 16 trillion...





No, do a little more reading and research - no one is trying to convince any landowner, it is their choice no different than they can choose to lease their land to hunters, sell their land to developers or hunt it themselves.


Re: No funding, no trespassing [Re: kyotee1] #2800034 12/01/11 02:14 PM
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 14,768
jeh7mmmag Offline OP
gramps
OP Offline
gramps
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 14,768
I had whole lot rather see the farmer, rancher, sportsman receive the money, benefit, & recreation, from their commodity sales (CCC) profits to foreign countrys. Than keep giving the huge amounts of TAXPAYERS money to Wall Street and Banking Industry, so they can reward their CEOs for their failures with millions $ bonus. Look at all the billions BI has gotten since 2007... We may never dig out of the fininacial meltdown and collapse of global economy of Sept 2008. Remember the To Big To Fail
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Too_big_to_fail
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Late-2000s_recession




VAP-HIP is Funded under the FSA Farm Bill of 2008

Up to $50 million in CCC funds is authorized to States and tribal governments through FY2012. Grant applications must describe intended benefits from encouraging public access to farm and ranch land for hunting, fishing, and other recreational purposes.

Priority to be given to program proposals that:

• are likely to be broadly accepted among landowners
• enroll land with appropriate wildlife habitat
• strengthen wildlife habitat improvement efforts on land enrolled in special conservation reserve enhancement program by providing incentives to increase public hunting and other recreational access
• use grant money in conjunction with other Federal, State, or tribal resources to carry out program
• notify public of location of land enrolled

Grants will be reduced by 25% if opening dates for migratory-bird hunting in a State are not consistent for residents and nonresidents. This does not apply to grants to tribal governments.


Voluntary Public Access and Habitat Incentive Program (VPA-HIP)

Overview

The Voluntary Public Access and Habitat Incentive Program (VPA-HIP) is a competitive grants program authorized under Section 1240R of the Food Security Act of 1985, as amended, and is only available for states and tribal governments. Up to $50 million is available through fiscal year 2012.


The primary objective of the VPA-HIP is to encourage owners and operators of privately-held farm, ranch and forest land to voluntarily make that land available for access by the public for wildlife-dependent recreation, including hunting or fishing, under programs implemented by state or tribal governments.

Grantees that are states will have the grant amount reduced by 25 percent if opening dates for migratory bird hunting in the state are not consistent for residents and non-residents. This reduction does not apply to grantees that are tribal governments.


Regulations at 7 CFR part 1455 govern the VPA-HIP.

Background

A number of states and tribal governments have public access programs for hunting, fishing, and other related activities. These programs provide rental payments and other incentives, such as technical or conservation services, to landowners who allow recreation on their land by the public, including hunting, fishing, or other appropriate activities.


The majority of the existing public access programs have limited scope and budgets; most existing programs have an annual budget of less than one million dollars per year. The goals of these existing programs include providing access for wildlife-associated recreation, wildlife management, helping local economies that depend on revenue from hunters, and encouraging conservation.

The funding provided by the VPA-HIP will help states and tribal governments address many issues that can greatly increase access and recreational experiences. Grant recipients will be able to use the funding to provide additional landowner incentives and conservation assistance and increase acreage available for public access.

Nothing in the VPA-HIP preempts liability laws that may apply to activities on any property related to grants made in this program; however, a number of states provide limited liability protection to landowners participating in state public access programs.

How the Program Works

Periodically, the Farm Service Agency (FSA) acting on behalf of the Commodity Credit Corporation (CCC) will publish a Request for Applications (RFA) on the federal government’s grants portal at www.grants.gov.


The RFA highlights considerations that should be adequately described in VPA-HIP applications and identifies evaluation criteria that will be used by FSA to determine VPA-HIP applications that will be approved and awarded funding. State and tribal governments submit applications to FSA through www.grants.gov. A federal interagency panel reviews and scores applications against evaluation criteria. FSA considers interagency review panel scoring in making a determination of which applications will be approved to receive VPA-HIP funding. Approved applicants must complete additional financial agreements and related assurances, and a programmatic environment assessment, before VPA-HIP funds awarded are released to them.

Who Can Participate

Only states and tribal governments are eligible for federal VPA-HIP funding. States and tribal governments may propose to use VPA-HIP grant funding to expand existing public access programs, create new public access programs, and/or provide incentives to enhance wildlife habitat on lands enrolled in state or tribal government public access programs.

Funding Priorities

Funding priority is given to applications that use VPA-HIP grant funding to implement public access programs to address these objectives:

• Maximize participation by landowners;

• Ensure that land enrolled in the program has appropriate wildlife habitat;

• Provide incentives to strengthen wildlife habitat improvement efforts on Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program (CREP) land;

• Supplement funding and services from other federal, state, tribal government or private resources that is provided in the form of cash or in-kind services and;

• Provide information to the public about the location of public access land.

Current Participation

Arizona, Colorado, Idaho, Illinois, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Michigan, Minnesota, Nebraska, North Dakota, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Dakota, Utah, Washington, and Wisconsin were approved for VPA-HIP funding and awarded multi-year (based on the availability of out-year funding) grants in 2010.


California, Georgia, Hawaii, Montana, New Hampshire, North Dakota, Pennsylvania, Texas, Virginia, Washington, and Wyoming, and the Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Nation were approved for VPA-HIP funding and will be awarded new or additional VPA-HIP funding in 2011.

For More Information

For more information on VPA-HIP, contact a local FSA office or visit FSA’s web site at: http://www.fsa.usda.gov/vpa.

Quote:
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Commodity Credit Corporation (CCC) is a wholly owned government corporation created in 1933 to "stabilize, support, and protect farm income and prices" (federally chartered by the CCC Charter Act of 1948 (P.L. 80-806)). The CCC is authorized to buy, sell, lend, make payments and engage in other activities for the purpose of increasing production, stabilizing prices, assuring adequate supplies, and facilitating the efficient marketing of agricultural commodities.

The CCC, which has no staff, is essentially a financing institution for USDA’s farm price and income support commodity programs, commodity export credit guarantees, and agricultural export subsidies. The programs funded through CCC are administered by employees of the Farm Service Agency and the Foreign Agricultural Service. The CCC has the authority to borrow up to $30 billion from the U.S. Treasury to carry out its obligations. Net losses from its operations subsequently are restored through the congressional appropriations process. It issues payments in the form of Commodity Certificates.




�Everybody needs beauty as well as bread, places to play in and pray in,
where nature may heal and give strength to body and soul.�
~ John Muir
Re: No funding, no trespassing [Re: jeh7mmmag] #2801182 12/01/11 08:28 PM
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 32,631
sig226fan (Rguns.com) Offline
duck & cover
Offline
duck & cover
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 32,631
Some of the APH cropland was from this incentive program for bird hunting.

I think too some of the offset that was for farmers leaving more buffer land around certain fields was part of it too. We had several farmers in our bird lease program that were getting an incentive to leave more land around the field un-plowed, and it was helping with dove, deer, and even some quail returns.


Re: No funding, no trespassing [Re: sig226fan (Rguns.com)] #2801262 12/01/11 08:50 PM
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 110,840
dogcatcher Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 110,840
If Congress would require that CRP land be made available for public hunting it change the way landowners line up for the payments. Those that choose the CRP payment would have to let the public access their CRP places for hunting. The others that drop out of the CRP would be saving the taxpayers money. A win for the taxpayer and the hunting public.



Combat Infantryman, the ultimate hunter where the prey shoots back.
_____________"Illegitimus non carborundum est"_______________

[Linked Image]
Re: No funding, no trespassing [Re: dogcatcher] #2802964 12/02/11 11:14 AM
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 14,768
jeh7mmmag Offline OP
gramps
OP Offline
gramps
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 14,768
Originally Posted By: dogcatcher
If Congress would require that CRP land be made available for public hunting it change the way landowners line up for the payments. Those that choose the CRP payment would have to let the public access their CRP places for hunting. The others that drop out of the CRP would be saving the taxpayers money. A win for the taxpayer and the hunting public.


Some of Texas counties have as high as 70% participation of there cultivated land in CRP (Foard and Hardeman). Even with drop outs that would mean opening up a couple of million acre across Texas alone to public hunting. Wow That would be a boom for sport and recreation. And a big cut in CRP expense. That would also mean a big bust to hunting leases owners. Never happen in Texas, but it a thought?



�Everybody needs beauty as well as bread, places to play in and pray in,
where nature may heal and give strength to body and soul.�
~ John Muir
Re: No funding, no trespassing [Re: sig226fan (Rguns.com)] #2802967 12/02/11 11:21 AM
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 14,768
jeh7mmmag Offline OP
gramps
OP Offline
gramps
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 14,768
Originally Posted By: sig226fan (Rguns.com)
Some of the APH cropland was from this incentive program for bird hunting.

I think too some of the offset that was for farmers leaving more buffer land around certain fields was part of it too. We had several farmers in our bird lease program that were getting an incentive to leave more land around the field un-plowed, and it was helping with dove, deer, and even some quail returns.




This is the program that covers those incentives:

Quote:

Agricultural Buffers and
Wildlife Conservation:
A Summary About Linear Practices

ABSTRACT Conservation practices such as filter strips, grassed waterways, buffers, contour strips,
riparian buffers, windbreaks and shelterbelts are eligible under a variety of USDA programs. Most were
originally designed to provide benefits regarding reduced soil erosion and improved water quality. Most
often grasses, or mixtures of grasses and forbs, are used in these practices, although establishment
of trees and shrubs is encouraged in some practices. The small area and high edge-area ratios limit
the usefulness of these practices for wildlife. Scientific evidence suggests that enrolling land in linear
practices has accumulated in recent years, although most studies still focus heavily on benefits to birds
and do not address the larger questions of the animal communities. With careful planning and management,
applying linear practices widely within an agricultural landscape could be expected to have positive
wildlife benefits compared with continued intensive row cropping.
http://www.fsa.usda.gov/Internet/FSA_File/chap_3.pdf




�Everybody needs beauty as well as bread, places to play in and pray in,
where nature may heal and give strength to body and soul.�
~ John Muir
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

© 2004-2024 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3