Well I guess I should have been shooting more bucks but does are so much better eating LOL. I have never set up a Camera until this year and last week when I got here something about the angle or obstructions kept the motion detector from going off too much. After moving it last Wednesday I checked the card today I still have not gotten through the 915 pictures from the week. Probably twice as many bucks on camera than does. I have been really more bow hunting only for the last five years and have still not Flung an arrow at a buck I was just wondering y'all's thoughts on these two guys I saw two at the end of the year last year during doe only that were bigger than them but they are regulars at the feeder. Of course I just have a week of pictures to go off of.

The pictures are a little better but do not have Internet on the computer in the pasture.

Both appear to be mature, but pictures get distorted when taking a pic of a pic.

These are WAGs based upon those photos. #1 is 5.5 and #2 is 6.5 or older. I'd say #1 scores a bit more despite his lack of mass, but #2 is a prettier deer to me.

My question is would either even hit 140?

Yeah the pictures really aren't that bad I'll work on getting them uploaded later.

Bigger deer, mid to upper 130s. Other deer, not close to 140.

Neither deer will hit 140 IMO. The first buck is the better of the two and he is maybe upper 130's. The second buck is a bit less at maybe upper 120's to maybe low 130's.

No sir. 134 and 128. Again, that's a WAG.

It's kind of what I figured I saw a lot bigger deer out there last year. But I guess you can't complain after one week of camera. I am just curious to see what shows up once they get broke up from their bachelors groups I did not have a single picture with a buck and a doe and it it was either all bucks or all does